MISSION PLATFORMS

Halo Security Platform

The control plane that produces your ATO.

Halo sits where AI agents act, decides what each agent may do, and enforces that decision before the action runs. Every allow and deny lands in a tamper-evident record an assessor can check offline, and the same record generates OSCAL authorization content.

One codebase, cloud to air-gap Offline-verifiable evidence OSCAL SSP and POA&M output Kubernetes-deployable
Ideal buyer ISSOs, AI security architects, platform owners Programs fielding agentic AI under review
Primary output Signed, verifiable evidence Ledger, OSCAL SSP and POA&M, export packs
Deployment One codebase, four profiles Connected cloud through air-gap
Standards context SP 800-53 · OSCAL · OWASP Agentic Top 10 Control families, SSP and POA&M, all ten risks mapped
FOR THE EXECUTIVE

Put AI agents to work without putting the authorization at risk.

AI agents call tools, write to memory, spend budget, and hand off work at machine speed, while the evidence for their authorization is still assembled by hand.

The outcome

Agents that act within limits you can prove.

Every agent action is checked against policy before it runs. The decision is recorded in a form an assessor can verify without trusting the vendor, and it counts as evidence for the controls in your security plan.

The risk it retires

An agent incident you cannot explain, and an ATO you cannot defend.

A hijacked prompt or a misused tool can do real damage, and logs anyone can edit do not show an Authorizing Official what happened. Halo blocks or escalates the risky action and keeps a tamper-evident trail behind each decision.

Why now

The rules for agentic AI are being written now.

OWASP published its Top 10 for Agentic Applications in December 2025, and FedRAMP 20x is moving authorization toward machine-readable OSCAL packages. Programs fielding agents today are assessed against these expectations.

HOW IT WORKS

Every decision produces its own proof.

Six stages share one audit path, so a firewall decision and a configuration change produce the same class of artifact.

1

Establish identity

People, services, and agents each get a distinct identity. Privileged operations require fresh re-authentication.

2

Register and govern

Agents, tools, prompts, and policies live in a catalog under a deny-by-default baseline. Modules are signed and checked before they install.

3

Intercept at the point of action

The agent SDK or the gateway sends each tool call and prompt through enforcement first. The answer is allow, sandbox, escalate, or deny, and a decision can only get stricter.

4

Detect and correlate

Analyzers look for ungrounded claims, deception, rogue behavior, and manipulation of human approvers. Signals link to incidents for timeline reconstruction.

5

Record

Every decision is appended to a per-tenant, tamper-evident ledger with signed checkpoints. Any edit to the history breaks verification.

6

Prove it anywhere

Ledger records link to controls and produce OSCAL SSP and POA&M content and signed export packs. A standalone verifier checks those packs inside a disconnected enclave.

REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE

Enforcement and evidence on one path.

Agents reach governed resources only after a recorded decision. Escalations go to a person, and every decision lands in the ledger that feeds the evidence.

Halo Security Platform reference architecture Halo reference architecture. AI agents, operators and ISSOs, and assessors reach the platform through a gateway that authenticates every request and carries identity forward. Enforcement applies to agents integrated through the SDK or the gateway. Inside the platform boundary, which is one codebase deployable connected, in regulated cloud, on premises, or air-gapped, the gateway forwards requests to an identity and authorization decision point and to a runtime enforcement point covering the tool firewall, prompt integrity, budgets, the memory vault, sandboxed execution, and secure messaging. The enforcement point returns allow, sandbox, escalate, or deny. Permitted calls reach governed tools and APIs, data and agent memory, and actions and spend. Escalations go to a human approval inbox, and detection analyzers feed incidents and replay. A catalog holds agents, tools, policies, and signed modules under a deny by default baseline. Every decision is written to a tamper-evident ledger with signed checkpoints and receipts. The ledger feeds a control graph, OSCAL output, and signed, redactable export packs. Export packs cross into a disconnected enclave, where an offline verifier rejects empty, forged, or tampered packs before signed bundles are imported. A data and operations layer holds a tenant-isolated store, telemetry, and signed backups. HALO PLATFORM, ONE CODEBASE: CONNECTED, REGULATED, ON-PREMISES, OR AIR-GAPPED DISCONNECTED ENCLAVE AGENT AND USER EDGE AI agents via the SDK or API Operators and ISSOs one console, step-up Assessors assessor workspace Enforcement applies to agents integrated through the SDK or the gateway. Gateway authenticates every request and carries identity forward Catalog agents, tools, policies, signed modules, deny by default Identity and authorization decision role and attribute rules, separation of duties, step-up Runtime enforcement point tool firewall, prompt integrity, budgets, memory vault sandboxed execution, secure messaging Decision: allow, sandbox, escalate, or deny Approval inbox escalations decided by a person under separation of duties Detection analyzers grounding, deception, rogue, manipulation, incidents and replay Tamper-evident ledger per-tenant record with signed checkpoints and signed query receipts Control graph controls and evidence OSCAL output SSP, POA&M, components Signed export packs redactable, verifiable DATA AND OPERATIONS tenant-isolated store, telemetry, signed backups GOVERNED RESOURCES Tools and APIs Data and agent memory Actions and spend Offline verifier rejects empty, forged, or tampered packs Verified import signed update, license, and trust bundles ONE AUDIT PATH every governed decision, including each denial, becomes a signed ledger entry linked to the control it supports
Figure 1. Reference architecture. Conceptual, public-safe view. Implementation details are not depicted.

Open the full-resolution diagram

THE PRODUCT

Four decisions, each one on the record.

The tool firewall and the executive dashboard, from the Halo console.

Halo Security Platform · Tool Governance Firewall
Halo console showing the Tool Governance Firewall. An evaluation of a privileged role grant by an operations agent returns escalate, requiring human approval under separation of duties. Summary tiles count allowed, denied, escalated, and sandboxed calls, and a table lists recent invocations with decision badges, risk bars, and reasons.
Figure 2. Tool Governance Firewall. A privileged call escalated for approval, above recent decisions showing all four outcomes. Sanitized screen with representative, synthetic data.
Halo Security Platform · Executive Dashboard
Halo console Executive Dashboard in a dark navy theme. Tiles show overall posture, evidence coverage, control test pass rate, and open POA&M items. Panels list authorization boundaries with their status, active modules with health indicators, and a recent activity feed with a ledger checkpoint, an evidence upload, a denied tool call, and a verified POA&M closure.
Figure 3. Executive Dashboard. Posture, evidence coverage, and open POA&M items rolled up across authorization boundaries. Sanitized screen with representative, synthetic data.
WHAT SETS IT APART

What holds up when an assessor pulls the thread.

One path for enforcement and evidence

The decision that blocks a tool call becomes a signed ledger entry linked to a control. OSCAL content comes from that same data, so the security plan describes what the runtime did.

Verifiable without trusting the vendor

Modules, checkpoints, receipts, and export packs are signed by the platform. A standalone verifier rejects empty, forged, or tampered packs with no access to the running system.

Air-gap is a profile, not a port

Connected cloud, regulated cloud, on-premises, and air-gapped are configurations of one codebase. Signed transfer and license packs carry updates in, and licensing never calls home.

Built for the agentic threat model

All ten OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications risks are mapped to platform capabilities and SP 800-53 controls, each with a coverage rating. Runtime checks address prompt injection, tool misuse, memory poisoning, and delegation abuse.

Decisions only get stricter

Authorization is deny by default, and no policy can downgrade a firewall deny. Approvals and POA&M closure require different people, and the code enforces it.

Hardened where it counts

Browser script never sees a session token, and every query is filtered by tenant, with database-level isolation available. Container images are signed and ship with a software and AI bill of materials.

HOW IT COMPARES

The combination is the point.

Halo puts runtime enforcement, a verifiable ledger, OSCAL evidence, and air-gap deployment in one platform. Established categories each cover part of that.

Category-level comparison based on typical capabilities in each category; individual products vary.
Capability Halo SaaS agent guardrails Cloud-native guardrails GRC documentation tools
Inline enforcement of agent tool actionsYes, through the SDK or gatewayYes, a core strengthPartial, tied to the providerNo
Action ledger an assessor can verify offlineYesRareProvider logsNo
OSCAL SSP and POA&M from runtime dataYesNot typicalNoDocumentation-centric
Air-gapped deploymentOne codebaseUncommonNoGenerally SaaS
Agent threat detectionDecision support for human reviewYes, a core strengthYesNo
WHERE IT LANDS FIRST

Start on one boundary. Expand by need.

Most programs begin with one authorization boundary and the agents already running on it.

Entry point

An audit trail for an ATO in progress

Ledger, evidence graph, and OSCAL output for one boundary, so agent actions reach the assessment as verifiable evidence.

Entry point

Guardrails for a SOC copilot

Tool firewall, detection, and human approval around an assistant that can query and act on security tooling.

Entry point

Runtime security in an enclave

The air-gapped runtime stack, with signed offline packs checked before import and no internet dependency.

Bought by ISSOs, AI security architects, platform owners, and SOC managers, usually after a 30-day proof of value on one boundary.

PACKAGING

Halo ships as 25 signed modules on one shared services plane, grouped into six capability areas: core trust, runtime enforcement, detection and response, compliance and evidence, composite packs, and ecosystem and program. Programs buy them in four tiers.

Tier 1

Core

Identity, authorization, the ledger, evidence packs, and runtime enforcement for protected agents.

Tier 2

Regulated

Adds continuous ATO evidence, requirements as code, detection analyzers, and forensic replay.

Tier 3

Sovereign / Air-Gap

Adds offline operation: signed transfer and license packs, offline verification, and FIPS-capable images.

Tier 4

Program

Adds managed agent certification and the assessor field kit, delivered with services.

STANDARDS AND MATURITY

Mapped to the frameworks your assessor already uses.

Evidence links to the requirement it supports. Alignment is in direction and scope, not a certification.

Standards, maturity, and intellectual property
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5Capabilities map to the AC, AU, CA, CM, IA, IR, SA, SC, and SI families.
NIST OSCALGenerates component definitions, SSPs, and POA&M content.
OWASP Top 10 for Agentic ApplicationsAll ten risks mapped to capabilities and controls, with a coverage rating for each.
NIST AI RMF 1.0 · CISA Zero Trust Maturity ModelAligned in risk vocabulary and in a deny-by-default, identity-centric design.
Authorization statusHalo produces artifacts that support FedRAMP, DoD impact level, and SOC 2 reviews. It is not itself authorized or certified under any of them, and it supports Authorizing Official judgment without replacing it.
Technology readinessTRL 5. Components validated end to end in a relevant laboratory environment. Production hardening, accreditation, and site-specific engineering are scoped per program.
Intellectual propertyPatent pending. Wagoner Enterprises, LLC has filed United States patent applications covering technologies in this product. No patent has yet issued.

This page is a public-safe overview. Interfaces, key handling, ledger construction, and detection logic are withheld and available under appropriate agreements.

GET STARTED

See the trust chain end to end.

We walk a representative agent workflow from the firewall decision to the ledger entry and the control it supports. Then we export the evidence pack and verify it offline in front of you, along with a tampered pack that fails.

Request Technical Walkthrough Back to all solutions Sanitized demonstrations available for classified environments.